MNBA ’reviewers’ opinions of manuscripts are invaluable in helping Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board in making correct decisions. Besides helping in assessment of the value and quality of a manuscript for the scientific literature and MNBA in particular, reviewers help authors improve their manuscripts by suggesting areas for the authors to address. Double anonymous peer review will help you keep up with the field and get new understandings that will improve the quality and value of your own studies. You will provide a valuable service to the readers by improving the quality of published papers anywhere they get published. In appreciation of your invaluable service to MNBA, your name will be included in a list we publish on the webpage of reviewers who have reviewed for MNBA. In addition, reviewers who consistently exhibit excellent reviews and respond promptly to the editorial requests are considered for invitation to the Editorial Board.
Important points for reviewing a manuscript
Novelty, scientific reliability, originality, the valuable contribution to the science, adding new aspects to the existed field of study, ethical aspects, structure of the article submitted and its relevance to the authors’ guidelines, references provided to substantiate the content, grammar, punctuation, and spelling, and scientific misconduct should be checked by reviewers.
Please consider the below comments for refereeing a manuscript